Categories
Military Science

Describe the MDMP and reflect upon its concepts and theories. Also discuss any m

Describe the MDMP and reflect upon its concepts and theories. Also discuss any major takeaways and expound upon how you can utilize this newly gained knowledge and develop members of your organization.
550 and 750 words. The response should be substantive and provide clarity by illustrating your understanding of the concepts and theories.

Categories
Military Science

Discuss step 4 of the Military Decision Making Process (MDMP), COA Analysis & Wa

Discuss step 4 of the Military Decision Making Process (MDMP), COA Analysis & War-Gaming, the role an Operations Sergeants Major should have during the process, and why.
with at least 2 cited sources and a minimum of 350-500 words. Identify the references.

Categories
Military Science

Discuss step 4 of the Military Decision Making Process (MDMP), COA Analysis & Wa

Discuss step 4 of the Military Decision Making Process (MDMP), COA Analysis & War-Gaming, the role an Operations Sergeants Major should have during the process, and why.
with at least 2 cited sources and a minimum of 350-500 words. Identify the references.

Categories
Military Science

Describe the MDMP and reflect upon its concepts and theories. Also discuss any m

Describe the MDMP and reflect upon its concepts and theories. Also discuss any major takeaways and expound upon how you can utilize this newly gained knowledge and develop members of your organization.
550 and 750 words. The response should be substantive and provide clarity by illustrating your understanding of the concepts and theories.

Categories
Military Science

This essay (4-6 pages) is due after the completion of F110. The final essay is a

This essay (4-6 pages) is due after the completion of F110. The final essay is a comparative analysis. You will compare the processes used to change the Army during the post-Vietnam timeframe to the processes used today. Use one of the Big 5 from your readings as the basis to conduct the comparison. The primary topic of the paper is not one of the Big 5, but using one of the Big 5 provides you the information needed to do a comparison of past processes vs. today’s processes.
JCIDS, DAS, PPBE, TAA, TAP, etc. did not exist during the post-Vietnam era. So how did the Army make decisions and how is that different than today? Why does it matter?
This is not a history paper of what happened in the past, nor is it a paper that acts like the current processes were used in the past. It is a comparative analysis. How did the Army decide what strategic changes needed to take place? How was it different than what happens today? What is your analysis of this difference/these differences? The preceding is an example for looking at strategic guidance. Ensure you address each of the ELOs. You must address materiel and organizational change in your essay. Ensure you do not simply restate history and regurgitate today’s process; that is not a comparative analysis between two different things. See the F100 Discussion Board for further discussion.

Categories
Military Science

See attached paper instructions and use situation D as a point of reference. For

See attached paper instructions and use situation D as a point of reference. Format is using the following ST 22-2 writing standard to include any additional citations.

Categories
Military Science

This essay (4-6 pages) is due after the completion of F110. The final essay is a

This essay (4-6 pages) is due after the completion of F110. The final essay is a comparative analysis. You will compare the processes used to change the Army during the post-Vietnam timeframe to the processes used today. Use one of the Big 5 from your readings as the basis to conduct the comparison. The primary topic of the paper is not one of the Big 5, but using one of the Big 5 provides you the information needed to do a comparison of past processes vs. today’s processes.
JCIDS, DAS, PPBE, TAA, TAP, etc. did not exist during the post-Vietnam era. So how did the Army make decisions and how is that different than today? Why does it matter?
This is not a history paper of what happened in the past, nor is it a paper that acts like the current processes were used in the past. It is a comparative analysis. How did the Army decide what strategic changes needed to take place? How was it different than what happens today? What is your analysis of this difference/these differences? The preceding is an example for looking at strategic guidance. Ensure you address each of the ELOs. You must address materiel and organizational change in your essay. Ensure you do not simply restate history and regurgitate today’s process; that is not a comparative analysis between two different things. See the F100 Discussion Board for further discussion.

Categories
Military Science

Military Decision-Making Process (MDMP) Purpose: To understand the application

Military Decision-Making Process (MDMP)
Purpose: To understand the application of Mission Analysis within the MDMP
Assignment Instructions: Analyze the concepts and theories you read about within this module; utilizing key terms from those concepts and theories, prepare a Mission Analysis briefing that shows your understanding of steps one and two of the MDMP.
Step 1 of MDMP: Receipt of Mission
Step 2 of MDMP: Mission Analysis

Requirements: Presentation of 6 to 10 slides (including Title Slide, Agenda, Conclusion, & References). Two other visual aids such as maps and diagrams are allowed. The presentation will describe steps one and two of the MDMP. It must display a clear understanding of key principles using real world examples.

Categories
Military Science

Based on allocation (see attached), I attached a friend’s paper (Solving the Pro

Based on allocation (see attached), I attached a friend’s paper (Solving the Problem), you can pick that topic if you would like to assist with writing the paper and reference are there to use. The points mentioned below are guidelines to provide more clarity as well as steer everyone on the right track. These are critical details I will be looking at when grading your paper and they are also common mistakes committed every semester. For your awareness.

From the instruction (see attached), you need to explain the ADM activity of your choice. As you described, remember to use examples to illustrate your explanation. An example can be a scenario of Russia/ Ukraine, Iran or classroom ADM’s activity etc. You decide which example suit your paper best.

In the instruction, it stated that you need to describe the importance of using ADM key concepts. There are several key concepts in ADM like operational art, collaboration, dialogue, system thinking, visual model, and narrative (refer to ATP 5-0.1, page 1-5). You need to embed and discuss some of these elements in your paper to meet the requirement of describing key concept. If not, your score for content will be affected. This is one of the most common mistakes.

In the instruction, it stated that you need to describe the importance of using tools and techniques. There are several tools and techniques in ADM like brainstorming, meta-questioning, and 4 ways of seeing (refer to ATP 5-0.1, page 3-6). You are not meeting this requirement if you did not embed and discuss some of these elements in your paper.

In the instruction, you are required to envision how you going to facilitate your chosen activity. You can envision using capacity as Ops SGM, 1SG, etc. You decide which suit you best. You can write this envision with a few sentences in every main paragraph or have one isolated paragraph, up to you. Most importantly, you write how you facilitate your chosen activity (for example – Framing the problem) and not facilitate ADM as a whole.

Last, do not regurgitate from the ATP 5-0.1. This is the most common mistake I have seen so far and it will result a big hit to your score. You need to use your own words to analyze and demonstrate your understanding of your chosen activity. One way is to use an example or scenario to augment your explanation.

I wish you all the best for your paper and feel free to approach me if you need any clarification.

Categories
Military Science

Based on allocation (see attached), I attached a friend’s paper (Solving the Pro

Based on allocation (see attached), I attached a friend’s paper (Solving the Problem), you can pick that topic if you would like to assist with writing the paper and reference are there to use. The points mentioned below are guidelines to provide more clarity as well as steer everyone on the right track. These are critical details I will be looking at when grading your paper and they are also common mistakes committed every semester. For your awareness.

From the instruction (see attached), you need to explain the ADM activity of your choice. As you described, remember to use examples to illustrate your explanation. An example can be a scenario of Russia/ Ukraine, Iran or classroom ADM’s activity etc. You decide which example suit your paper best.

In the instruction, it stated that you need to describe the importance of using ADM key concepts. There are several key concepts in ADM like operational art, collaboration, dialogue, system thinking, visual model, and narrative (refer to ATP 5-0.1, page 1-5). You need to embed and discuss some of these elements in your paper to meet the requirement of describing key concept. If not, your score for content will be affected. This is one of the most common mistakes.

In the instruction, it stated that you need to describe the importance of using tools and techniques. There are several tools and techniques in ADM like brainstorming, meta-questioning, and 4 ways of seeing (refer to ATP 5-0.1, page 3-6). You are not meeting this requirement if you did not embed and discuss some of these elements in your paper.

In the instruction, you are required to envision how you going to facilitate your chosen activity. You can envision using capacity as Ops SGM, 1SG, etc. You decide which suit you best. You can write this envision with a few sentences in every main paragraph or have one isolated paragraph, up to you. Most importantly, you write how you facilitate your chosen activity (for example – Framing the problem) and not facilitate ADM as a whole.

Last, do not regurgitate from the ATP 5-0.1. This is the most common mistake I have seen so far and it will result a big hit to your score. You need to use your own words to analyze and demonstrate your understanding of your chosen activity. One way is to use an example or scenario to augment your explanation.

I wish you all the best for your paper and feel free to approach me if you need any clarification.